K-5 Lens Selection.
Link
Posted 27/01/2011 - 21:48
Ok - so this thread should perhaps be in the "Lenses" forum, but it's not, so there!
I'm now seriously thinking of buying a K-5. I currently have a K-X which I bought with the 18-55 & 50-200 kit lenses. Question is, is the K-5 with the 18-135 WR lens really worth £340 more than with the 18-55 & 50-200 WR lenses? I feel that the 18-135mm range would be very useful, but would that be at the expense of image quality? "He's not the Messiah, ..."
Link
Posted 27/01/2011 - 21:56
As you already cover this range try going outside these, maybe closer or even longer.
My Flickr link "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon) K-5 IIs, K-7 (100,000 clicks) My Lenses (or what's left after the arrival of the 300*) Pentax DA*16-50 - DA35 f2.4 - A 50mm f1.7 - FA50 f1.4 - DA*300 f4 Sigma 24mm f2.8 - 70-200 f2.8 - 180mm Macro 1:2 f2.8 (ancient but spectacular) Vivitar Series 1 105mm f2.4 Macro
Link
Posted 27/01/2011 - 22:07
SteveEveritt wrote: As you already cover this range try going outside these, maybe closer or even longer. One of the main reasons for opting for the K-5 is its weather resistance (I live in Scotland. It sometimes rains here "He's not the Messiah, ..."
Link
Posted 27/01/2011 - 22:10
Have you looked at this review?
http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax_18-135mm_review.php Dave Pentax K-01/40 ltd/18-55/M28 2.8/M42 55 1.8 Please visit my flickr: link
Link
Posted 27/01/2011 - 22:24
Blincodave wrote: Have you looked at this review? Yep - I have now. Thanks Dave. "He's not the Messiah, ..."
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 00:43
There are persistent rumours of a WR version of the DA 55-300mm. Not that that's much use to you right now of course
Pentax K20D + BG2 Grip | Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 | Pentax 18-55mm II | Pentax 35mm Macro Limited | Pentax 50mm Macro | Pentax 50-200mm ED | Samsung 100mm Macro | Vivitar 28mm f2.8 | Helios 77M-4 | Metz Mecablitz 48 AF-1 | Redsnapper TRI-283 Last Edited by MrCynical on 28/01/2011 - 00:43
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 00:56
A meagre 7 for sharpness!
K20D...ist DS ,DA18/55,DA16/45.DA* 50/135,"A"1.7 50MM..."A" 70/210..M 50mm f2...Tamron 90mm macro,28/300 Tamron,200/500 Tamron 6.9....A Pentax DA*300... Sigma10/20,FA31mm 1.8 Ltd*********,FA 77mm Ltd! Last Edited by beginner on 28/01/2011 - 00:59
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 09:08
Hopefully my replacement K-5 will arrive today (after nearly 7 weeks of waiting it gets sent for delivery on a day when I have to go out for most of the morning)
I have the 2 kit WR lenses so I should be able to give you a comparison. No equipment list here .... move along the bus please.
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 09:25
I have the 18-135 WR and it is a very useful all purpose lens.The range from moderate wide angle to medium telephoto is extremely versatile and has the added advantage of being weatherproof.
As regards how good it is I would agree with the view that it is at least as good and probably a little better than the standard kit lenses. There is some distortion at the wide end but this is easily corrected in-camera with the K-5 (JPEGS only - Raw has to be corrected in pp) The other point is that it is relatively small and light though well built. The new DC AF is very fast. It does not have wide apertures but the high ISO abilities of the K-5 compensate. If you want the highest IQ you need the Limiteds or DA* lenses of course but as a general purpose, go anywhere lens I have found it very useful. Whether it is worth the rather high price only you can decide. Archie
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 10:28
The price of the 18-135mm is already dropping fast (see Leads to Deals section) and it's starting to look very interesting.
When I'm ready I'll just buy one. Pentax don't make bad lenses so I'm sure it will be very usable, especially with WR. Best regards, John
Link
Posted 28/01/2011 - 13:55
beginner wrote: A meagre 7 for sharpness! Take no notice. Look at example pics instead and make your mind up. My Sigma 30/1.4 scored low on some review's sharpness arbitrary number becuase it is a bit softer at the edges wide open. Precisely where you don't mind it being not sharp anyway, so it's irrelevant. The lens is razor sharp where you need it and has a lovely vibe. Bodies: 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808 Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more .. Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283 Smeggy's Forum and Pics Last Edited by Smeggypants on 28/01/2011 - 14:18
Link
Posted 29/01/2011 - 15:06
beginner wrote: A meagre 7 for sharpness! And that's from a softly-softly 'review' on the Other Forum which deliberately avoided mention of barrel distortion (traditionally the weakest point of superzooms). Pentax K20D + BG2 Grip | Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 | Pentax 18-55mm II | Pentax 35mm Macro Limited | Pentax 50mm Macro | Pentax 50-200mm ED | Samsung 100mm Macro | Vivitar 28mm f2.8 | Helios 77M-4 | Metz Mecablitz 48 AF-1 | Redsnapper TRI-283 |
Login to Pentax User
Latest News and Articles Pentax Q7 Hands-On PreviewWe go hands-on with the new Pentax Q7, the smallest interchangeable lens camera. Pentax K-500 DSLR Hands-On PreviewWe go hands-on with the new entry level Pentax K-500 Digital SLR. Pentax Launch 07 Mount Shield LensPentax has launched its fourth lens in the Unique lens series for Pentax Q cameras. Pentax Launch Q7 Interchangeable lens CameraPentax has launched a new addition to its Q series interchangeable lens cameras. Free Newsletter |